The Big Question is:

Wednesday, December 10, 2008

Long time no see?

You may have noticed that we've been quiet for a while; we were requested by a member of the CANG (via email) to "lay off" and not to interfere with the proceedings; or not to provide fodder/evidence for the AIRC; we have primarily stuck to that request, but cannot remain silent.

Yesterday marked the final negotiating meeting for the "2008 Certified Shafting" in 2008. We presume this makes it a "2009 Certified Shafting" process after all.

As predicted by us back in April, nothing above CPI has been conceded by our wonderful employer and to get that we need to surrender conditions of employment that the employer cannot be trusted to administer in a fair and reasonable manner.  

They have form, none of it good!

Airshambles has hitched their wagon to the latest 'sky is falling' crisis that has come along; this time the financial credit crunch and reduced airline growth (note not reductions just slowing growth) is to blame, last time it was the crushing impacts of fuel increases and reducing airline industry figures produced by IATA combined with the Howard workchoices implementation dates.; the time before that it was the collapse of Ansett and post Sept 11 aviation market reductions.

Can we as a collective catch a break?

Well since 2001 we have observed massive growth in movements of bigger and bigger aircraft, providing now huge revenues with ever decreasing wages. We have seen or 'customers' produce record after record profits all the while playing the 'sky is falling' card.

Airshambles Australia is offering you in "real terms" a reduction of between 8 and 17 %, depending on the value of the conditions of employment they want you to surrender, some say much more.  Airshambles claims that they have provided a fair and reasonable offer.

We have seen more and more ATCs depart for other paddocks or simply removing their shingle from the stoop and running away to another locations; we have seen more than ever the reliance on overtime, and the few of us that remain on the boards under more pressure than ever; particularly when 'required' to attend for additional duty, or at least made to feel that way.

The supply and demand argument is definitely in our favour; bugger the 'frame work arguments' because they principles contained within that document are being selectively chosen or selectively ignored.

We note that a deal is not likely now until well into the new year.

That the wagons are being circled on both sides and an industrial battle looks more likely than not.

That the promises by TFN for "a better way" have probably resulted in the most hostile negotiations in recent memory.  

We hate to say it, but WE TOLD YOU SO.

Thursday, September 18, 2008

Gooorne

We here at the shafters would like to wish all the best to the greatest HR advisor that our once proud company has ever seen.

The "King of Bling", "KOB", "Jolly Jumper", "Jolly Jumbuck", "the bloke I wouldn't piss on if he was one fire", otherwise known as Gary, has left the building. 

Gary, our long time fan, we hope you had the time of your life.

Tuesday, September 9, 2008

Relax Staffing Crisis Over

Cameron Creedy - The ORRRRSTRALIAN

39 August 2008

The flying public should now have every confidence that the Orrrrstralian aviation environment will run efficiently from early tomorrow. True to his word the CEO of Airshambles (Grog Rustler) announced today that the alleged ATC staffing crisis had been officially resolved.

"Yes we have had 25 closures / disruptions after August 31, hence the move to extend August just once; because I'd previously committed to no crisis after August."

"Look we had our troubles, we were left in a horrible position by the previous management." Mr Rustler said, "I came to this business, and like any new CEO, had to make my mark, so I reduced the decentralisation of the core activities, this made us much more efficient."  

"The most difficult task we had was convincing the modern world to amend their calendars in a one off adjustment, we were pleasantly surprised with the support we got from the Ministry of funny walks, but now we can officially welcome September with gusto."

Rustler said, "Some people said I just sacked people and made the others we kept work harder, it's not the way it happened, I gave people generous resignation and retirement benefits and diluted those often duplicated duties amongst the remaining workforce."

"Sure it would appear that it was a dud decision, and that's who I'm blaming next." Mr Rustler said. "Hindsight is always wonderful in hindsight, we didn't know that our staff were telling us the truth when they said it was a stupid decision and wouldn't work."

To appease the workers, in 2006-7 Airshambles hired almost 20% more staff than they had previously enabled to explore other options, but these were mostly in clerical roles, which is now running more efficiently than ever.

"We had to take this business in a new direction, we have, now it's completely on course." Mr Rustler said, "Look you have to understand that the future of the business is looking very bright, some may say the only way is up, I don't feel that way, if we play our cards right during contract negotiations we can get much lower than this."

Meanwhile Mr Rickturd Dooright, Airshambles PR chief stated, "Those saying this company is a bad place to work need to realise that it's a big bad world out there, what skills can our employees sell on the open market, they are trapped and we know it and they need to know it too."

"Our staff just complain, but they don't go anywhere, this tells us that deep down, we have them by the balls, or they would have left long ago.  Sure some have jumped off the lifeboat, but look where they are headed, to high cost of living environments, they'll need to double their pay to survive."

"Our intention is to pay market rates, and we own this market so we determine the rate." said Mr Dooright.

Meanwhile the staffing unions that represent the workers, Filtered Air and CUPS, said that the management have got it wrong.

Mr Minsick, a Vice President at Filtered Air, said that "Airshambles was flogging themselves, these Johnny come lately management types aren't realistic, it starts at the top and works it's way down like a very vicious cancer, each stupid idea must be trumped by a stupider idea."

"What we don't see is the Board even appearing to care, at least they could pretend to care" said Mr Minsick, "we expect the controllers to turn on each other, or us their union, before they stand up to the hollow men from the Bullshit Castle."

"Rumours of people leaving in droves are highly over exaggerated." Mr Rustler said today.  "I have fully briefed the minister Mr Lemoneasy, I have his full backing, he understands it's not my fault."

When questioned about 15 trainees employed earlier this month, 4 months prior to their training commecning Mr Rustler simply stated, "I reject the allegations that we are hiding or wasting anything, we had no plans to train everyone at once, we planned to employ 80 trainees this year, we are planning on doing that, we are right on course. At no time did we state we would graduate 80 trainees out of the college this year, hell we didn't even say we'd train 80 people, we are just taking 80 trainees."

"We plan to take 100 trainees next year" Mr Rustler said, "We don't think that anyone expects that it means 100 graduates, or even 100 controllers in training, it means 100 trainees , training or not, and nothing more".

Wednesday, September 3, 2008

PRESS RELEASE


As it appears to have slipped the Airservices Australia management team’s observation, or quite possibly it was noticed but remains deliberately unreported, Certified Shafting would like to make the following major announcement.

May 2008 was the single busiest month in Australia’s air traffic control history*.

The 303,112 movements nationwide smashed the previous high of 294,712 set more than seven years ago in March 2001. This figure is an extraordinary affirmation of the professionalism and dedication of the nation’s air traffic controllers, who have achieved this amazing feat under the cloud of constant and oppressive managerial attacks, critical short staffing and the lowest levels of morale in the company’s history.

Our sincerest congratulations to the devoted men and women who dedicate their lives to keeping Australia’s airways safe.

*source:
http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/projectsservices/reports/maa.asp?id=2008

Wednesday, August 27, 2008

Boo Hoo - Sookie sookie la la

We here at certified shafting get lots of information from time to time; some of this information is 'gold', some is unrepeatable, some is made up and scurrilous, some is just damn funny.


We understand that at last weeks National Executive meeting there was broad and robust discussions about the treatment ALMs are getting from the rank and file membership of Civil Air.


The ATSM Divisional rep, doing his job, representing his members, reported about commentary he had received from ALMs.  Apparently the collective ALM group is pissed off and annoyed at the way the rank and file members lambaste (bag, rubbish, admonish, castigate, chastise, chide, rebuke, reprimand) them particularly in an anonymous fashion on the various forums, but particularly so on the unions forum.


We here at Certified Shafting have absolutely nothing to say other than HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.


NOW THAT IS FUNNY!


The poor little "cherubs" who failed to follow, our advice, the unions advice and has generally individualised themselves away from the collective by signing an AWA.   Now they are annoyed that the individuals who potentially have been shafted by these ALMs and the decisions they took to remove themselves from the collective are having a go at them.  


BOO HOO! Grow up.  


You had a choice, whatever your individual justification, you deserve what you get, you made your choice.  You are now a manager, you are on your own AWA.  For those who attempt to justify you had no choice, well you were wrong, you just couldn’t stomach the other options, go cry to your mum, not your union.


For the ALMs (and other senior roles) who held strong and didn’t sign an individual contract (AWA) good on you, we hope the stench flowing towards your ‘colleagues’ doesn’t stick to you too.

Project SHHHHH!

http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24248226-31477,00.html


Traffic controller merger plan stalls

Cameron Stewart | August 27, 2008 


AN ambitious plan to save taxpayers more than $300million by ending the wasteful separation of the nation's civil and military air traffic management systems has stalled.


$300million, wow what a headline.  Where is this money coming from?  Facilities management, reduced wages, location costs?  Or is it a total furphy?  


Defence has backed away from any rapid implementation of the plan to create a unified national system, declaring it wants to move only at "a measured pace, cognisant of the requirements to maintain Defence capability". 


Defence doesn’t trust Airshambles to deliver, they think putting the fox in charge of the hen house is a silly idea; they like their hens.


This is despite Defence claims, made in a 2002 document signed by the current Australian Defence Force chief Angus Houston, that "Australia simply cannot justify, sustain or afford to continue operating two almost identical Air Traffic Management systems". 


Afterwards they wised up, will Airshambles provide ‘critical’ military airspace services when there’s commercial revenue to be chased; what faith has airservices demonstrated where they currently provide a service to military airspace, the Richmond RAAF base is provided an approach service by the civil controllers in the Sydney TMA.


The Defence go-slow has angered civil air traffic control manager Airservices Australia, which wants to push ahead with the unification plan, arguing it would produce savings of more than $300 million. 


They can’t understand why the RAAF is restricting their plans to save their own staffing crisis. 



Airservices spokesman Richard Dudley told The Australian: "Airservices and Defence have both been discussing an improved, national air traffic management system for a decade, but Defence concerns over loss of its own 'capability', difficulties with funding models and no real incentives for change have precluded real progress. 


The RAAF are right to be concerned, Airshambles can’t get it’s own house in order, why would you give them more control? What “guarantees” would there be about service provision?


"The existence of two independent air traffic control and airspace management systems driven by different objectives, priorities and cultures hampers the delivery of a better product for Australia. Improving the inter-operability has the potential to produce savings in the order of $300 million plus." 


There’s that figure again.  We don’t believe that figure is a ‘true cost’ at all.  Think about the numbers, 258 controllers in the RAAF.  Cost = $300,000 each (way too much) total  $77.4M; so are we saying the RAAF spends over $223.5M on their system and facilities?


If so giving them TAAATS consoles and sharing development costs would be much more efficient than merging the organisations. ADATS (the system used by the RAAF) is no doubt expensive to buy and maintain and change, but it was a ‘customised’ product for RAAF use, do they need it, probably not, but will TAAATS give them what they want, definitely not.


No wait, NEWS FLASH, the $300M is not ‘annualised’; it’s a total.  Over how long?  25 years? 10 years? 


Australia developed separate civil and military air traffic management systems because it was considered necessary to meet the separate specific requirements of civil and military flying. 


Well not quite, all military forces had or have had their own controlling workforce, there are not too many in the world who do not.  


Primarily because the substantive differences in deployment and defence capabilities; but also there are substantive differences in ‘dealing’ with military operations, that civil controllers do get involved with occasionally, but very rarely.



A 2002 study, obtained by The Australian, found that having separate systems was no longer essential and that the duplication was a waste of taxpayers' money. 


No doubt the duplication wastes costs in terms of systems and facilities, but essentially the ‘body cost’ is identical.  The RAAF is right to not trust Airshambles to deliver the ‘right bodies’ for their needs; they can’t delivery enough bodies for it’s own needs. 


In 2005, the Air Force and Airservices set up a program called Genesis to integrate military air traffic control into the civil system. 


They have transferred the PEARCE RAAF TCU to TAAATS and the Perth Terminal Unit, but the ‘blue shirts’ still have their blue shirts. They are just co-located; but still very separate units.


Defence now says Genesis failed to deliver viable reforms and although it remains committed in theory to a unified national system, major obstacles remain. It is understood to believe that integration proposals have not paid sufficient attention to its need to have tactical and strategic air traffic control in a time of crisis.


Whose crisis?  Airshambles would love to deploy the remaining RAAF controllers where it needs them, you could immediately see RAAF deployment/capability/services significantly reduced as the ‘free’ controllers (cross paid by the RAAF) would get them out of the huge staffing hole that Airshambles has manufactured.  


What is Airshambles ‘urgent’ motivation for fast tracking Genesis; it’s not about saving the tax payer or the government money you can bet your last cent on that.


Maybe they are more concerned about having to spend serious money to provide a 'Civil' facility at Williamtown (Newcastle) because CASA has told them to provide the service there outside RAAF hours, and the RAAF have said not using our kit (national security etc.) or staff (they are ours) you don't. 

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Focus on Training

Training crisis for air traffic controllers

Paul Bibby August 26, 2008


THEY were recruited to address Australia's critical shortage of air traffic controllers, but the latest crop of trainees at the Airservices Australia learning academy are effectively twiddling their thumbs because there are not enough instructors to teach them, academy sources and the air traffic controllers union say.

Classic, this is a classic case of WE TOLD YOU SO!  Idiots, 80 trainees a year, hell 100, why not.  And pay them to sit on their arses watching the Olympics and surfing the internet, don’t pay them to train as controllers.  ATC Awareness courses for Air Traffic Control trainees, Classic!

Airservices Australia has repeatedly claimed it is addressing the shortage - which is resulting in large areas of air space going unmonitored each day - by dramatically increasing the number of new recruits each year.

I guess you can increase them all you like at this rate, hell why not recruit 500 controller trainees, that way you can say you are replacing all the retirements and all the bastards leaving for jobs overseas.

But a staff member from the Melbourne academy says the latest intake of around 15 trainees have been given jobs running an air-traffic simulator program and told their training will not begin for three months because there are not enough instructors.

But the Learning Academy is state of the art, it’s been restructured, twice, in the current CEOs tenure, to be flexible and cope with the demands of the modern world.  One Manager received the coveted “Australia Day Award” for his role in that process.  He’s now left the organisation, of course.

"The simulator program requires people to act as pilots while others learn how to be controllers; they're called simulator service operators and Airservices already employs people to do that," the staff member said.

"But because there are no instructors, that's what the latest group are being told to do all day. There is virtually no benefit other than to learn a bit about what it's like to be a pilot."

Any delay in the training of the recruits would be significant given the safety problems created by the air traffic controllers shortage.

This is as good as Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth”, we can’t train them, so why employ them?  180 trainees recruited between 2008 and 2009, how many controllers will that be by mid 2010?  NONE! Idiots.  How many by 2011?  At this rate, NONE!   - THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A CONTROLLER AND A TRAINEE OR RECRUIT (EVEN WHEN YOU TRAIN THEM).

Large sections of air space go unmonitored almost every day and there have been a number of highly publicised mid-air near-misses, which some in the industry have blamed on the shortage.

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority recently stepped in to limit the number of passenger jets allowed to fly through the uncontrolled zones.

Then they denied doing that?

Airservices says it has increased the intake of new recruits from 48 last year to 80 this year and 100 in 2009.

But isn’t that the point of this story, 80 people doing what?  Training or being paid as trainees, there’s a big difference.  What is BIG TONY doing with this latest INFO, oh that’s right, Mr “Head in the Sand”, or Ostrich, is doing nothing?

It strongly denied there was any shortage of instructors and said trainees spent more than 70 per cent of the course in the simulator where they developed practical skills. It did not specify what role they took in the program.

What course time, they don’t start one until Feb 2009, yet they are already employed, it’s a fraud.

"There is no setback of any training duration due to instructor shortages," its statement said.

"All current courses are running according to the planned schedule."

WTF?  You know they are lying right?

Trainees at the college have been asked to sign confidentiality agreements which prevent them from speaking to the media.

As have all Airshambles employees.

But the executive secretary of the controllers union, Peter McGuane, said the learning academy had been allowed to run down, and that having trainees working as simulator service officers breached Airservices' own manual of standards.

"The manual says training courses must use … instructors or training officers with current expertise and identified qualifications appropriate to achieving the goals of the course," Mr McGuane said.

The MOS says a lot of things, not many of them are enforced. CASA?

"These trainees aren't being supervised at all. They've created this situation for themselves by not hiring replacement instructors and not bringing in extra instructors to cope with the new intake - they're repeating the same mistakes they made with the controllers."

Well they may as well play amongst themselves, there is only so many hours one can spend on the internet you know.

Airservices said it had a rotation plan that allowed instructors to swap between the academy and the country's control centres.

Now that’s funny!  How many current controllers are instructing at the college?

"Airservices has spent over $17 million on the academy in the past year," its statement said.

But what does that mean?  Facilities, wages, trainees, SSOs, electricity, heating, water, text books, computers, new machines that go PING?