The Big Question is:
Wednesday, December 10, 2008
Long time no see?
Thursday, September 18, 2008
Gooorne
Tuesday, September 9, 2008
Relax Staffing Crisis Over
Wednesday, September 3, 2008
PRESS RELEASE
As it appears to have slipped the Airservices Australia management team’s observation, or quite possibly it was noticed but remains deliberately unreported, Certified Shafting would like to make the following major announcement.
May 2008 was the single busiest month in Australia’s air traffic control history*.
The 303,112 movements nationwide smashed the previous high of 294,712 set more than seven years ago in March 2001. This figure is an extraordinary affirmation of the professionalism and dedication of the nation’s air traffic controllers, who have achieved this amazing feat under the cloud of constant and oppressive managerial attacks, critical short staffing and the lowest levels of morale in the company’s history.
Our sincerest congratulations to the devoted men and women who dedicate their lives to keeping Australia’s airways safe.
*source: http://www.airservicesaustralia.com/projectsservices/reports/maa.asp?id=2008
Wednesday, August 27, 2008
Boo Hoo - Sookie sookie la la
We here at certified shafting get lots of information from time to time; some of this information is 'gold', some is unrepeatable, some is made up and scurrilous, some is just damn funny.
We understand that at last weeks National Executive meeting there was broad and robust discussions about the treatment ALMs are getting from the rank and file membership of Civil Air.
The ATSM Divisional rep, doing his job, representing his members, reported about commentary he had received from ALMs. Apparently the collective ALM group is pissed off and annoyed at the way the rank and file members lambaste (bag, rubbish, admonish, castigate, chastise, chide, rebuke, reprimand) them particularly in an anonymous fashion on the various forums, but particularly so on the unions forum.
We here at Certified Shafting have absolutely nothing to say other than HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA HA.
NOW THAT IS FUNNY!
The poor little "cherubs" who failed to follow, our advice, the unions advice and has generally individualised themselves away from the collective by signing an AWA. Now they are annoyed that the individuals who potentially have been shafted by these ALMs and the decisions they took to remove themselves from the collective are having a go at them.
BOO HOO! Grow up.
You had a choice, whatever your individual justification, you deserve what you get, you made your choice. You are now a manager, you are on your own AWA. For those who attempt to justify you had no choice, well you were wrong, you just couldn’t stomach the other options, go cry to your mum, not your union.
For the ALMs (and other senior roles) who held strong and didn’t sign an individual contract (AWA) good on you, we hope the stench flowing towards your ‘colleagues’ doesn’t stick to you too.
Project SHHHHH!
http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24248226-31477,00.html
Traffic controller merger plan stalls
Cameron Stewart | August 27, 2008
AN ambitious plan to save taxpayers more than $300million by ending the wasteful separation of the nation's civil and military air traffic management systems has stalled.
$300million, wow what a headline. Where is this money coming from? Facilities management, reduced wages, location costs? Or is it a total furphy?
Defence has backed away from any rapid implementation of the plan to create a unified national system, declaring it wants to move only at "a measured pace, cognisant of the requirements to maintain Defence capability".
Defence doesn’t trust Airshambles to deliver, they think putting the fox in charge of the hen house is a silly idea; they like their hens.
This is despite Defence claims, made in a 2002 document signed by the current Australian Defence Force chief Angus Houston, that "Australia simply cannot justify, sustain or afford to continue operating two almost identical Air Traffic Management systems".
Afterwards they wised up, will Airshambles provide ‘critical’ military airspace services when there’s commercial revenue to be chased; what faith has airservices demonstrated where they currently provide a service to military airspace, the Richmond RAAF base is provided an approach service by the civil controllers in the Sydney TMA.
The Defence go-slow has angered civil air traffic control manager Airservices Australia, which wants to push ahead with the unification plan, arguing it would produce savings of more than $300 million.
They can’t understand why the RAAF is restricting their plans to save their own staffing crisis.
Airservices spokesman Richard Dudley told The Australian: "Airservices and Defence have both been discussing an improved, national air traffic management system for a decade, but Defence concerns over loss of its own 'capability', difficulties with funding models and no real incentives for change have precluded real progress.
The RAAF are right to be concerned, Airshambles can’t get it’s own house in order, why would you give them more control? What “guarantees” would there be about service provision?
"The existence of two independent air traffic control and airspace management systems driven by different objectives, priorities and cultures hampers the delivery of a better product for Australia. Improving the inter-operability has the potential to produce savings in the order of $300 million plus."
There’s that figure again. We don’t believe that figure is a ‘true cost’ at all. Think about the numbers, 258 controllers in the RAAF. Cost = $300,000 each (way too much) total $77.4M; so are we saying the RAAF spends over $223.5M on their system and facilities?
If so giving them TAAATS consoles and sharing development costs would be much more efficient than merging the organisations. ADATS (the system used by the RAAF) is no doubt expensive to buy and maintain and change, but it was a ‘customised’ product for RAAF use, do they need it, probably not, but will TAAATS give them what they want, definitely not.
No wait, NEWS FLASH, the $300M is not ‘annualised’; it’s a total. Over how long? 25 years? 10 years?
Australia developed separate civil and military air traffic management systems because it was considered necessary to meet the separate specific requirements of civil and military flying.
Well not quite, all military forces had or have had their own controlling workforce, there are not too many in the world who do not.
Primarily because the substantive differences in deployment and defence capabilities; but also there are substantive differences in ‘dealing’ with military operations, that civil controllers do get involved with occasionally, but very rarely.
A 2002 study, obtained by The Australian, found that having separate systems was no longer essential and that the duplication was a waste of taxpayers' money.
No doubt the duplication wastes costs in terms of systems and facilities, but essentially the ‘body cost’ is identical. The RAAF is right to not trust Airshambles to deliver the ‘right bodies’ for their needs; they can’t delivery enough bodies for it’s own needs.
In 2005, the Air Force and Airservices set up a program called Genesis to integrate military air traffic control into the civil system.
They have transferred the PEARCE RAAF TCU to TAAATS and the Perth Terminal Unit, but the ‘blue shirts’ still have their blue shirts. They are just co-located; but still very separate units.
Defence now says Genesis failed to deliver viable reforms and although it remains committed in theory to a unified national system, major obstacles remain. It is understood to believe that integration proposals have not paid sufficient attention to its need to have tactical and strategic air traffic control in a time of crisis.
Whose crisis? Airshambles would love to deploy the remaining RAAF controllers where it needs them, you could immediately see RAAF deployment/capability/services significantly reduced as the ‘free’ controllers (cross paid by the RAAF) would get them out of the huge staffing hole that Airshambles has manufactured.
What is Airshambles ‘urgent’ motivation for fast tracking Genesis; it’s not about saving the tax payer or the government money you can bet your last cent on that.
Maybe they are more concerned about having to spend serious money to provide a 'Civil' facility at Williamtown (Newcastle) because CASA has told them to provide the service there outside RAAF hours, and the RAAF have said not using our kit (national security etc.) or staff (they are ours) you don't.
Tuesday, August 26, 2008
Focus on Training
Training crisis for air traffic controllers
Paul Bibby August 26, 2008
THEY were recruited to address Australia's critical shortage of air traffic controllers, but the latest crop of trainees at the Airservices Australia learning academy are effectively twiddling their thumbs because there are not enough instructors to teach them, academy sources and the air traffic controllers union say.
Classic, this is a classic case of WE TOLD YOU SO! Idiots, 80 trainees a year, hell 100, why not. And pay them to sit on their arses watching the Olympics and surfing the internet, don’t pay them to train as controllers. ATC Awareness courses for Air Traffic Control trainees, Classic!
Airservices Australia has repeatedly claimed it is addressing the shortage - which is resulting in large areas of air space going unmonitored each day - by dramatically increasing the number of new recruits each year.
I guess you can increase them all you like at this rate, hell why not recruit 500 controller trainees, that way you can say you are replacing all the retirements and all the bastards leaving for jobs overseas.
But a staff member from the Melbourne academy says the latest intake of around 15 trainees have been given jobs running an air-traffic simulator program and told their training will not begin for three months because there are not enough instructors.
But the Learning Academy is state of the art, it’s been restructured, twice, in the current CEOs tenure, to be flexible and cope with the demands of the modern world. One Manager received the coveted “Australia Day Award” for his role in that process. He’s now left the organisation, of course.
"The simulator program requires people to act as pilots while others learn how to be controllers; they're called simulator service operators and Airservices already employs people to do that," the staff member said.
"But because there are no instructors, that's what the latest group are being told to do all day. There is virtually no benefit other than to learn a bit about what it's like to be a pilot."
Any delay in the training of the recruits would be significant given the safety problems created by the air traffic controllers shortage.
This is as good as Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth”, we can’t train them, so why employ them? 180 trainees recruited between 2008 and 2009, how many controllers will that be by mid 2010? NONE! Idiots. How many by 2011? At this rate, NONE! - THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A CONTROLLER AND A TRAINEE OR RECRUIT (EVEN WHEN YOU TRAIN THEM).
Large sections of air space go unmonitored almost every day and there have been a number of highly publicised mid-air near-misses, which some in the industry have blamed on the shortage.
The Civil Aviation Safety Authority recently stepped in to limit the number of passenger jets allowed to fly through the uncontrolled zones.
Then they denied doing that?
Airservices says it has increased the intake of new recruits from 48 last year to 80 this year and 100 in 2009.
But isn’t that the point of this story, 80 people doing what? Training or being paid as trainees, there’s a big difference. What is BIG TONY doing with this latest INFO, oh that’s right, Mr “Head in the Sand”, or Ostrich, is doing nothing?
It strongly denied there was any shortage of instructors and said trainees spent more than 70 per cent of the course in the simulator where they developed practical skills. It did not specify what role they took in the program.
What course time, they don’t start one until Feb 2009, yet they are already employed, it’s a fraud.
"There is no setback of any training duration due to instructor shortages," its statement said.
"All current courses are running according to the planned schedule."
WTF? You know they are lying right?
Trainees at the college have been asked to sign confidentiality agreements which prevent them from speaking to the media.
As have all Airshambles employees.
But the executive secretary of the controllers union, Peter McGuane, said the learning academy had been allowed to run down, and that having trainees working as simulator service officers breached Airservices' own manual of standards.
"The manual says training courses must use … instructors or training officers with current expertise and identified qualifications appropriate to achieving the goals of the course," Mr McGuane said.
The MOS says a lot of things, not many of them are enforced. CASA?
"These trainees aren't being supervised at all. They've created this situation for themselves by not hiring replacement instructors and not bringing in extra instructors to cope with the new intake - they're repeating the same mistakes they made with the controllers."
Well they may as well play amongst themselves, there is only so many hours one can spend on the internet you know.
Airservices said it had a rotation plan that allowed instructors to swap between the academy and the country's control centres.
Now that’s funny! How many current controllers are instructing at the college?
"Airservices has spent over $17 million on the academy in the past year," its statement said.
But what does that mean? Facilities, wages, trainees, SSOs, electricity, heating, water, text books, computers, new machines that go PING?
