The Big Question is:

Tuesday, August 26, 2008

Focus on Training

Training crisis for air traffic controllers

Paul Bibby August 26, 2008


THEY were recruited to address Australia's critical shortage of air traffic controllers, but the latest crop of trainees at the Airservices Australia learning academy are effectively twiddling their thumbs because there are not enough instructors to teach them, academy sources and the air traffic controllers union say.

Classic, this is a classic case of WE TOLD YOU SO!  Idiots, 80 trainees a year, hell 100, why not.  And pay them to sit on their arses watching the Olympics and surfing the internet, don’t pay them to train as controllers.  ATC Awareness courses for Air Traffic Control trainees, Classic!

Airservices Australia has repeatedly claimed it is addressing the shortage - which is resulting in large areas of air space going unmonitored each day - by dramatically increasing the number of new recruits each year.

I guess you can increase them all you like at this rate, hell why not recruit 500 controller trainees, that way you can say you are replacing all the retirements and all the bastards leaving for jobs overseas.

But a staff member from the Melbourne academy says the latest intake of around 15 trainees have been given jobs running an air-traffic simulator program and told their training will not begin for three months because there are not enough instructors.

But the Learning Academy is state of the art, it’s been restructured, twice, in the current CEOs tenure, to be flexible and cope with the demands of the modern world.  One Manager received the coveted “Australia Day Award” for his role in that process.  He’s now left the organisation, of course.

"The simulator program requires people to act as pilots while others learn how to be controllers; they're called simulator service operators and Airservices already employs people to do that," the staff member said.

"But because there are no instructors, that's what the latest group are being told to do all day. There is virtually no benefit other than to learn a bit about what it's like to be a pilot."

Any delay in the training of the recruits would be significant given the safety problems created by the air traffic controllers shortage.

This is as good as Al Gore’s “Inconvenient Truth”, we can’t train them, so why employ them?  180 trainees recruited between 2008 and 2009, how many controllers will that be by mid 2010?  NONE! Idiots.  How many by 2011?  At this rate, NONE!   - THERE IS A HUGE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN A CONTROLLER AND A TRAINEE OR RECRUIT (EVEN WHEN YOU TRAIN THEM).

Large sections of air space go unmonitored almost every day and there have been a number of highly publicised mid-air near-misses, which some in the industry have blamed on the shortage.

The Civil Aviation Safety Authority recently stepped in to limit the number of passenger jets allowed to fly through the uncontrolled zones.

Then they denied doing that?

Airservices says it has increased the intake of new recruits from 48 last year to 80 this year and 100 in 2009.

But isn’t that the point of this story, 80 people doing what?  Training or being paid as trainees, there’s a big difference.  What is BIG TONY doing with this latest INFO, oh that’s right, Mr “Head in the Sand”, or Ostrich, is doing nothing?

It strongly denied there was any shortage of instructors and said trainees spent more than 70 per cent of the course in the simulator where they developed practical skills. It did not specify what role they took in the program.

What course time, they don’t start one until Feb 2009, yet they are already employed, it’s a fraud.

"There is no setback of any training duration due to instructor shortages," its statement said.

"All current courses are running according to the planned schedule."

WTF?  You know they are lying right?

Trainees at the college have been asked to sign confidentiality agreements which prevent them from speaking to the media.

As have all Airshambles employees.

But the executive secretary of the controllers union, Peter McGuane, said the learning academy had been allowed to run down, and that having trainees working as simulator service officers breached Airservices' own manual of standards.

"The manual says training courses must use … instructors or training officers with current expertise and identified qualifications appropriate to achieving the goals of the course," Mr McGuane said.

The MOS says a lot of things, not many of them are enforced. CASA?

"These trainees aren't being supervised at all. They've created this situation for themselves by not hiring replacement instructors and not bringing in extra instructors to cope with the new intake - they're repeating the same mistakes they made with the controllers."

Well they may as well play amongst themselves, there is only so many hours one can spend on the internet you know.

Airservices said it had a rotation plan that allowed instructors to swap between the academy and the country's control centres.

Now that’s funny!  How many current controllers are instructing at the college?

"Airservices has spent over $17 million on the academy in the past year," its statement said.

But what does that mean?  Facilities, wages, trainees, SSOs, electricity, heating, water, text books, computers, new machines that go PING?


No comments: